Rethinking Human Capital Theory in High Education; Academic Staff Development and Knowledge Outcomes, in Democratic Republic of Congo, (DRC)

by Musamba Ponyo Lucie, Sikitu Bashonga Justin, Victoria Abigail Masiko Kabumba

Published: June 27, 2026 • DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000148

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between academic staff development and knowledge outcomes in higher education institutions in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), while critically reassessing the applicability of Human Capital Theory (HCT) in fragile and developing contexts. Traditionally, HCT views education and training as investments that improve productivity, institutional performance, and economic growth. However, higher education in the DRC is shaped by institutional, political, and socio-economic challenges that complicate the assumptions of conventional human capital perspectives.
The study adopts a qualitative literature review methodology using secondary data drawn from academic journals, books, policy documents, and institutional reports related to higher education, academic staff development, and HCT. Through thematic analysis, the research explores how academic staff development is experienced within universities and how it influences knowledge outcomes such as teaching quality, research productivity, innovation, and institutional performance.
Findings indicate that academic staff development in the DRC extends beyond formal training programs to include informal mentoring, self-directed learning, international collaborations, and professional networks. However, these processes are constrained by inadequate funding, weak institutional support, limited research infrastructure, heavy teaching workloads, political instability, and brain drain. The study further demonstrates that improvements in academic qualifications do not automatically translate into enhanced institutional outcomes, contrary to assumptions advanced by traditional HCT.
The study argues that conventional Human Capital Theory alone is insufficient for explaining higher education realities in fragile contexts such as the DRC. Alternative perspectives, including the Capability Approach, Institutional Theory, and critical higher education frameworks, provide more comprehensive explanations of how individual agency, institutional conditions, and socio-political environments shape academic staff development and knowledge outcomes. The study contributes to debates on higher education development in Africa and highlights the need for sustainable institutional support systems to strengthen academic capacity and knowledge production.