Evaluation of Water Purification Methods among Residents of Dutse Metropolis, Jigawa State, Nigeria.
by Dr. Ado Shehu, Fatima Musa Aliyu, Mubarak Alhassan, Prof. A. A. Umar, Prof. SN Garba, Ummukulsum Mustapha
Published: May 6, 2026 • DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1315PH00082
Abstract
Background: Access to safe drinking water remains a public health challenge in sub-Saharan Africa. This study evaluated water purification methods and their determinants among residents of Dutse Metropolis, Jigawa State, Nigeria.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 355 adult residents selected through multistage sampling. Data were collected using structured interviewer-administered questionnaires and analyzed using SPSS version 25, with chi-square tests and binary logistic regression at p < 0.05 significance level.
Results: Borehole (45.1%) and well water (30.4%) were the primary drinking water sources. Although 68.7% of households practiced water purification, 31.3% consumed untreated water. Boiling was the most common method (28.2%), followed by filtration (17.5%), alum use (12.4%), and chlorination (10.6%). Knowledge of waterborne diseases was high (72.4%), yet a knowledge-practice gap persisted. Educational level was significantly associated with purification practice (p = 0.001). Logistic regression revealed that respondents with tertiary education were six times more likely to practice water purification (AOR = 6.00, 95% CI: 2.48–14.53) compared to those with no formal education. Knowledge of waterborne diseases increased the likelihood of treatment fivefold (AOR = 5.36, 95% CI: 3.05–9.42), while cost was a significant barrier (AOR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24–0.67).
Conclusion: Despite moderate uptake of water purification, significant gaps exist, driven by educational and economic factors. Improving household water safety requires integrated strategies combining health education, subsidized treatment options, and long-term investment in water infrastructure.