From Risk to S.A.F.E.R. School: Evaluating the Disaster Awareness and Preparedness of the Employees in a Higher Education Institution

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to evaluate the level of disaster awareness and preparedness of the employees in a Higher Education Institution. It also determined the relationship between variables and the factors that influence disaster awareness and preparedness.
Method: The study used a descriptive-correlational design utilizing both quantitative and qualitative approaches in determining the level of disaster awareness and preparedness of the 212 employees in a higher education institution which utilized a complete enumeration. There were 30 randomly selected participants involved in the interview. The study utilized a researcher-made questionnaire and a validated tool to evaluate the level of disaster awareness and awareness. Both questionnaires were pre-tested using Cronbach’s reliability testing. The study also utilized an interview guide question on factors that influence disaster awareness and preparedness. The study was analyzed using simple percentage, weighted mean, chi- square and spearman rant test. Thematic content analysis was used to interpret and analyze qualitative data.
Results: The employees are partially aware and partially prepared on disaster. Age, length of service and number of related trainings and seminars attended were found to have a significant relationship with the level of disaster awareness. The level of disaster preparedness was found no significant relationship to the profile. The factors that facilitate disaster awareness are trainings and seminars, disaster manual, information campaign, and warning signs. The facilitating factors for disaster preparedness are disaster drills, emergency equipment, evacuation plan, and trainings and seminars. The hindering factors for disaster awareness are passive attitude, inadequate information, limited resources, and insufficient warning signs. The factors that hinder disaster preparedness are equipment and facility uncertainty, passive attitude, and dormant disaster risk reduction team.