Wake Effects and Energy Yield Optimization under Realistic Wind Conditions at Ngong Hill Wind Farm
by Kamau, Joseph Ngugi, Omboto, Jane Kwamboka, Saoke, Churchill Otieno, Wekesa, David W.
Published: April 11, 2026 • DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11030070
Abstract
This study evaluates wind resource characteristics, wake effects, layout optimization, uncertainty, and operational strategies using long-term hourly wind data (2010 - 2019) and a one-year validation dataset from the year 2022. The power loss is analyzed using the Jensen wake model, and simulation for power output done with simulations in PYTHON®. The most frequent wind speeds occur within the 4 - 6 m/s range, with a mean extrapolated hub-height wind speed of 9.38 m/s at 50 m. The shape and scale parameters were k = 3.29 and c = 9.81 m/s, corresponding to a Betz-adjusted extractable power of 509 W/m², classifying the site as Wind Power Class V at 50 m. Wake modelling showed that the existing layout experiences wake losses of 28.2%, reducing the no-wake Annual Energy Produced (AEP) from 61.86 GWh to 44.41 GWh. Genetic Algorithm-based layout optimization aligned turbine spacing with the dominant wind direction (≥4D along-wind and ≥3D cross-wind), reducing wake losses to 23% and yielding an approximate 5% AEP improvement. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that ±0.02 variations in the wind shear exponent result in 6–8% changes in AEP, while ±10% perturbations in the Weibull scale parameter produce energy yield variations exceeding ±15%, magnitudes comparable to wake-loss reduction gains. Further, approximately 27% of annual hours occur at wind speeds below 6 m/s, primarily during May-August, as well as during nocturnal and early-morning hours (2100hours - 0300 hours). Maintenance scheduled within these low-wind windows incurs only about 15% of the energy loss associated with maintenance conducted at mean wind conditions, corresponding to an estimated 85% reduction in maintenance-related energy losses. The results demonstrate that maximizing energy yield at Ngong Hills requires a combined strategy integrating aerodynamic layout optimization, uncertainty-aware modelling, and wind-aware maintenance scheduling.